The Simplicity of Track Meets

My oldest daughter is a high school freshman and youngest daughter is in 7th grade. Both are track student-athletes and we are into our 3rd year of watching track meets. I am learning more about the structure--although I have to ask my wife to remind me the order of events nearly every meet. Now, I haven't looked up the evolution of the track structure, but I bet it involved coaches getting together and discussing how they can maximize the effectiveness of
their sprinters and distance runners, and everyone in between.

In schools, we do not take this approach. We don't take a simplistic approach to solving our issues and like track, the structure doesn't reasonably change. Bells ring, student move to classes, and 7 hours later the day ends.  Is it because we never have laser-like focus of each of the participants in our schools?  Is it overthinking or not knowing how to simplify the teaching and learning systems? We continually bring in a regional speaker for bullying, a research-based program for literacy, a web-based program to assist with grammar, and yet another computer program for math skills. Mostly, we do this in an effort to close a gap or to meet a district goal. However, the overall effect can never be narrowed to a singular approach because we have changed too many variables.

The track coaches and student-athletes know the structure and know how to warm-up and rest for each event. For example, the distance running events are spaced in such a way that the athlete has enough time to recover before performing in the next event. It is unlikely the student-athlete running the 3200m run is also running in the 100m dash. Like the hamstrings and quadriceps of a runner, the brain is a muscle as well. It can be worked and tested and trained to perform optimally. It also requires rest and oxygen. How do we take the structure of school and marry it with learning--which learning is the running in the track analogy--to maximize the effectiveness of our students?

I give these three suggestions:

1.  Analyze the school day and schedule.

Are core academics spread throughout the day with encore/elective courses in between to support the various types of learning? We wouldn't want our 100m sprinter running the 200m right after his event. Also, look for other ways to ensure the school day/school year is balanced with diverse learning opportunities.

2.  Analyze the school breakfast and lunch programs.

Are students feeding their brain and bodies with well-balanced meals? Don't forget to check the vending options, the school store, and the student always carrying their book bag weighed down with several pounds of candy. I've noticed the options at the concessions at track meets often include more nutritious options than the basketball and football games I've attended.

3.  Review all the initiatives and programs offered to students.

Are the programs redundant or are they asking the brain to work in a manner that doesn't maximize learning?  In other words, are they causing the distance runner to compete in back-to-back events. We shouldn't ask a student to go from English Language Arts to the Scholastic Read 180 program.

Remember, sometimes less means more.